<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>True Stella Awards</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.stellaawards.com,2012://10</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10" title="True Stella Awards" />
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:52:30Z</updated>
    <subtitle>The basics of spam, &quot;phishing&quot; and other e-mail pests, how they got your address in the first place -- and what to do now that you&apos;re inundated.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.361</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>We Focus on the USA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/usa.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2372" title="We Focus on the USA" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2372</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:52:40Z</published>
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:52:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice that ) Defendants. ) Jurisdiction is Limited to the USA _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice that
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Jurisdiction is Limited to the USA</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> Some readers have been writing to ask
why we only feature cases from U.S. courts.</p>

<p>While we're sure that there are cases of lawsuit abuse -- or <I>apparent</i> abuse -- in other countries, this is an American publication written by an American author. The author is a reasonably knowledgeable lay person (not a lawyer) who has something to say about the problems he sees around him. To fairly discuss the legal systems in <I>other</i> countries would require knowledge about the legal system in each country. Obviously very few people have that kind of specialized multi-national knowledge and experience (and the ones who do make a <I>lot</i> more money!)</p>

<p>The "title" on these "pleading paper" pages do note we're talking about the U.S. Justice System. That has been our plan all along, and will remain so for the foreseeable future. We do know
from our mail, however, that readers in other countries are finding the cases most interesting and entertaining, and we appreciate your taking the time to read the True Stella Awards.</p>

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <I>In Pro Per</i>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stella Awards Subscriptions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/subscribe.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2368" title="Stella Awards Subscriptions" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2368</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:45:05Z</published>
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:53:22Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice that ) Defendants. ) Free Subscriptions Are No Longer Available _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice that
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Free Subscriptions Are No Longer Available</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> Subscriptions to Stella Awards
are <b>free!</b> Just enter your e-mail address below.</p>

<p>Each Stella Awards e-mail will present one or more interesting cases for your judgment: does the case reasonably use the American Justice System -- or is the plaintiff instead trying to make a quick buck at the expense of taxpayers, insurance companies (read: the people who pay insurance premiums) or other deep pockets?</p>

<p>We pay the costs of this distribution by including ads in our e-mails. We will <i>never</i> send ads-only e-mails.</p>

<p><font size="+1">We protect your privacy</font> -- we <i>never</i> release our subscriber e-mail addresses. More info <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/privacy.html">here</a>.</p>
<a name=terms></a>
<p><table border=0 bgcolor="F5F5F5" cellpadding=5><tr><td><center><font size="+2"><b>Terms of Service</b></font></center></p>
<p align="justify">Stella Award's free edition is offered without charge for your personal use. In return for your free subscription, you agree to abide by the terms of the copyright notice included in each issue, <i>and</i> you agree that you are responsible for maintaining your own subscription, including changing your own address or stopping your subscription when you choose. Unsubscribe instructions are included in every issue and <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/change.html">here</a>.</p></td></tr></table>

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i></p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The &quot;Real&quot; Stella</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/stella.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2367" title="The &quot;Real&quot; Stella" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2367</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:41:02Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-31T01:18:23Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) Stipulates the Facts from ) Defendants. ) The &quot;real&quot; Stella&apos;s Case _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      Stipulates the Facts from
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">The "real" Stella's Case</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> We know quite well that not <i>all</i> of the cases we present will turn out to be frivolous abuse of the American Justice System. Many of these cases indeed involve real issues, real injuries, and deserve real compensation. And some don't. That's why we stress that you should read the cases <I>before</i> you judge.</p>

<p>How about, for instance, Stella herself? Much of the coverage about Stella Liebeck has
been grossly unfair. When you have a more complete summary of the facts, you might change
your mind about her. Or maybe not -- that's up to you. Did you know the following aspects of
the Stella vs. McDonald's case?</p>

. . .

<ul><li>Stella was not driving when she pulled the lid off her scalding McDonald's coffee. Her grandson was driving the car, and he had pulled over to stop so she could add cream and sugar to the cup.</li>
<br /><li>Stella was burned badly (some sources say six percent of her skin was burned, other sources say 16 percent was) and needed two years of treatment and rehabilitation, including skin grafts. McDonald's refused an offer to settle with her for $20,000 in medical costs.</li>
<br /><li>McDonald's quality control managers specified that its coffee should be served at 180-190 degrees Fahrenheit. Liquids at that temperature can cause third-degree burns in 2-7 seconds. Such burns require skin grafting, debridement and whirlpool treatments to heal, and the resulting scarring is typically permanent.</li>
<br /><li>From 1982 to 1992, McDonald's coffee burned more than 700 people, usually slightly but sometimes seriously, resulting in some number of other claims and lawsuits.</li>
<br /><li>Witnesses for McDonald's admitted in court that consumers are unaware of the extent of the risk of serious burns from spilled coffee served at McDonald's required temperature, admitted that it did not warn customers of this risk, could offer no explanation as to why it did not, and testified that it did not intend to turn down the heat even though it admitted that its coffee is "not fit for consumption" when sold because it is too hot.</li>
<br /><li>While Stella was awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages, this amount was reduced by 20 percent (to $160,000) because the jury found her 20 percent at fault. Where did the rest of the $2.9 million figure in? She was awarded $2.7 million in punitive damages -- but the judge later reduced that amount to $480,000, or three times the "actual" damages that were awarded. </li>
<p><i>But...</i>
<br /><li>The resulting $640,000 isn't the end either. Liebeck and McDonald's entered into secret
settlement negotiations rather than go to appeal. The amount of the settlement is not known
-- it's <i>secret!</i></li>
<br /><li>The plaintiffs were apparently able to document 700 cases of burns from McDonald's coffee over 10 years, or 70 burns per year. But that doesn't take into account how many cups are sold <i>without</i> incident. A McDonald's consultant pointed out the 700 cases in 10 years represents just 1 injury per <i>24 million</i> cups sold! For every injury, no matter how severe, 23,999,999 people managed to drink their coffee without any injury whatever. Isn't that proof that the coffee is not "unreasonably dangerous"?</li>
<br /><li>Even in the eyes of an obviously sympathetic jury, Stella was judged to be 20 percent at fault -- she did, after all, spill the coffee into her lap all by herself. The car was stopped, so she
presumably was not bumped to cause the spill. Indeed <i>she</i> chose to hold the coffee cup
between her knees instead of any number of safer locations as she opened it. Should she have
taken more responsibility for her own actions?</li>
<p><i>And...</i>
<br /><li><b>Here's the Kicker:</b> Coffee is <i>supposed</i> to be served in the range of 185 degrees! The National Coffee Association recommends coffee be brewed at "between 195-205 degrees Fahrenheit for optimal extraction" and drunk "immediately". If not drunk immediately, it should be "maintained at 180-185 degrees Fahrenheit." (Source: <a href="http://www.ncausa.org" target="new">NCAUSA</a>.) Exactly what, then, did McDonald's do wrong? Did it exhibit "willful, wanton, reckless or malicious conduct" -- the standard in New Mexico for awarding punitive damages?</ul>

<p>The Court of Public Opinion has also issued its verdict: Stella has become an American icon. Rightly or wrongly, she is a symbol of the American Tort system gone wrong, and most have heard of her case -- and have an opinion on it. For more than 10 years, the term "Stella Award" has been used to refer to any lawsuit that sounds outrageous. Because of this huge name recognition, we chose to continue the name that has captured the public's attention like no other: "Stella Awards". But rather than use <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/bogus.html">fabricated stories</a> to illustrate a real problem, our goal is to legitimize the "Stella Awards" name by reporting <i>real</i> case stories (in the <i>This is True</i> tradition) to get the point across much more powerfully.</p>

<p>As for Stella herself: she died on August 5, 2004, at 91 years old.</p>

<p>Abuse of the system <i>is</i> going on, and sometimes judges and juries grievously err and set terrible precedents. Don't believe it? <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/book.html">Read our book</a> for a <i>lot</i> more on this issue.</p>

<p>Submitted by: <br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Our E-mail Privacy Policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/privacy.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2365" title="Our E-mail Privacy Policy" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2365</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:37:07Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-26T23:46:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of our ) Defendants. ) Iron-Clad Privacy Policy _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of our
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Iron-Clad Privacy Policy</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<BLOCKQUOTE>

<P><FONT SIZE="+1">May it please the court:</font> <b>Most</b> of this policy is moot since we no longer operate a mailing list. All previously registered addresses will be deleted from our servers as of 1 August 2012. The policy we operated under was (and remains):</p>

<p><b>We <I>hate</i> junk mail!</b> "Spam" mail is the bane of the Internet. If you aren't bothered by it, you probably will be soon. We <B>refuse</b> to add to this illegitimate use of the Internet: we not only <B><I>will not</i> </b> provide your e-mail address to <I>any</i> advertiser, we actually work rather hard to keep it secret. You don't have to request that your e-mail address be "concealed" -- we "conceal" <I>all</i> subscriber addresses.</p>

<P>We further protect privacy and e-mail security in general by requiring that new subscribers "confirm" their subscription. This helps to prevent people from harassing others by subscribing them to something they may not want. When you send in a subscription request, either via a web form or by e-mail, you will receive a machine-generated message asking you to confirm your subscription. You <I>must</i> reply to this message (you don't have to say anything, just reply to the message) before your subscription will be activated. Of course, you may always <B>cancel</b> (or <B>"unsubscribe"</b>) at any time: see the bottom of any of our mailings to see how. (In fact, in exchange for your <I>free</i> subscription, we require <I>only</i> that you abide by the terms of the copyright notice in every issue, and that you agree to control your own subscription -- or, if you no longer want one, your "unsubscription" -- via those easy-to-use tools.)</p>

<p>Stella Awards' publisher has been very proactive in educating Internet users about what spam is, why it's bad, and what can be done about it. We encourage you to learn more -- the more you know about spam and e-mail scams, the less likely <I>you</i> will be victimized by them. Please visit our <A HREF="http://www.SpamPrimer.com">Spam Primer</a> (offsite: opens in a new window).</p>

<p><b>In addition,</b> since our company's formation in 1983, it has been our policy to never sell customer <I>postal</i> addresses, either. We miss out on profit opportunities by not selling our customer addresses, but that's how <I>we</i> want to be treated by the companies we do business with, so that's how we treat our customers. Simple, eh?</p>

<p><FONT SIZE="+1">Terms of Service:</font> Stella Award's free edition is offered without charge for your personal use. In return for your free subscription, you agree to abide by the terms of the copyright notice included in each issue, <I>and</i> you agree that you are responsible for maintaining your own subscription, including changing your own address or stopping your subscription when you choose. Unsubscribe instructions are included in every issue.</p>

<p><FONT SIZE="+1">Underage Subscribers:</font> Stella Awards is designed for adults and well-educated, older teens. Kids under 13 will not likely understand the commentary or irony, and we do not knowingly accept subscriptions for pre-teens. Any pre-teens discovered on our distribution will be deleted. Any particularly brainy kids that want to read Stella Awards
should ask a parent to subscribe, and then ask to read their parent's copy.</blockquote>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Media Info -- Publishing Our Annual Awards</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/media_info_publishing_our_annual_awards.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2363" title="Media Info -- Publishing Our Annual Awards" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2363</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:32:15Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-26T23:57:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Media Info Publishing or Airing our Annual Awards Thanks for your interest in the True Stella Awards. You do not need special permission to publish or air our annual award summaries if you follow the requirements noted below. Very Important! Please be sure you have reviewed the urban legend page on this site before you prepare any story for print or air! Many media outlets have made themselves look like complete fools (let alone suffered damage to their credibility) by publishing falsified case write-ups that were not issued by StellaAwards.com as if they were true. References to our publication should use the full formal name: the &quot;True Stella Awards&quot;. Thank you....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<CENTER><FONT SIZE="+3"><B>Media Info</b></font>
<BR><FONT SIZE="+2"><B>Publishing or Airing our Annual Awards</b></font></center>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><FONT SIZE="+1">Thanks for your interest in the True Stella Awards. You do <I>not</i> need special permission to publish or air our annual award summaries <I>if</i> you follow the requirements noted below.</font>
<P><CENTER><TABLE WIDTH=50% BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=8 BGCOLOR="yellow"><TR><TD><B>Very Important!</b> Please be sure you have reviewed the
<A href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/bogus.html">urban legend</a> page on this site before you prepare any story for print or air! <I>Many</i> media outlets have made themselves look like complete fools (let alone suffered damage to their credibility) by publishing <I>falsified</i> case write-ups that were not issued by StellaAwards.com as if they were true. References to our publication should use the full formal name: the "True Stella Awards". Thank you.</td></tr></table></center>]]>
        <![CDATA[<UL><LI><B>For All:</b> Please note that <I>all</i> StellaAwards.com case write-ups are copyrighted with all rights reserved. We appreciate your reviewing these requirements so that you may properly obtain legal permission to publish or broadcast our awards. Sadly, our caution has proven necessary. <I>Please take your time to read this document in its entirety.</i></p>

<P><LI><B>Print Publications:</b> You may publish all the summaries or any subset of them <I>if</i> you note the source is StellaAwards.com, and you do not alter the text of any particular summary. We <I>request</i> you also send us a copy of the issue the story was published in (or tearsheets, or e-mail us the URL the text appears on if it is also published on your web site). If also published on your web site, the linking requirement in the "Web sites" section <I>does</i> also apply to you.</p>
<P><LI><B>Web sites:</b> You may publish all the summaries or any subset of them <I>if</i> you note the source is StellaAwards.com, you do not alter the text of any particular summary, <I>and</i> include a hot link to www.StellaAwards.com or, if you prefer, directly to the <a href="2002.html">2002</a>, <a href="2003.html">2003</a>, <a
href="2004.html">2004</a>, <a href="2005.html">2005</a>, <a href="2006.html">2006</a> or <a href="2007.html">2007</a> award pages. It is fine if the True Stella Awards site opens in a new browser window. Please e-mail us the URL of the page the text appears on.</p>
<P><LI><B>E-mail Publications:</b> You may publish all the summaries or any subset of them <I>if</i> you note the source is <B>StellaAwards.com</b> and you do not alter the text of any particular summary. We <I>request </i> you also send us a copy of the e-mail issue carrying the text. <B>Do not</b> subscribe us to your publication! If also published on your web site, the linking requirement in the "Web sites" section <I>does</i> also apply to you.</p>
<P><LI><B>Radio Stations:</b> You may read all the summaries or any subset of them <I>if</i> you note the source is StellaAwards.com, and you do not alter the wording of any particular summary. We <I>request</i> you also send us a copy of the segment in MP3 format, or on CD, or e-mail us the URL the audio is also posted on your web site). If also posted on your web site, the linking requirement in the "Web sites" section <I>does</i> also apply to you.</p>
<P><LI><B>TV Stations:</b> You may read or display all the summaries or any subset of them without specific permission <I>if</i> you note the source is StellaAwards.com, and you do not alter the wording of any particular summary. We <I>request</i> you also send us a copy of the segment in DVD or VHS format, or e-mail us the URL the video is also posted on your web site). If also posted on your web site, the linking requirement in the "Web sites" section <I>does</i> also apply to you. Because the full text is a bit much for most TV outlets, we will approve condensations of the text <I>on a case-by-case basis.</i> Please <A HREF="contact.html">contact the author</a> for permission. (Best procedure: e-mail the proposed condensation and then telephone to ensure we've spotted your request. We can <I>usually</i> turn around requests within a day; follow
up with a phone call if your deadline is looming.)</p>
<P><LI><B>Other:</b> Please <A HREF="contact.html">contact us</a> for specific permission. </ul> <B>We apologize</b> for the seemingly anal requirements, but our caution is the result of hard-learned experience suffered at the hands of your less professional colleagues. Thanks for your understanding.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Restraint of Trade</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/powergrab.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2362" title="Restraint of Trade" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2362</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:23:38Z</published>
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:51:37Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of this ) Defendants. ) Attempted Power Grab _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of this
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Attempted Power Grab</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> <P><FONT SIZE="+1"><B>Old Boys Club</font>
<br>by Randy Cassingham</b>
<br>Originally published: 26 March 2003</p>

<p><font size="+1">The cases presented</font> in the <I>True Stella Awards</i> are typically selected to illustrate various aspects of the runaway problems in our civil legal system. The aim, over the long run, is to clearly show that there is no one aspect of the problem that needs change to "fix" the entire system; the problems are indeed systemic. It's definitely not just bad lawyers, or too many of them (though that's part of it). It's not just that the medical profession isn't weeding out bad doctors (though that's part of it). It's not just that insurance companies
encourage frivolous claims and suits by making "nuisance" payments to make complainers go
away (though that's part of it). And it's not just average citizens who refuse to take
responsibility for their own actions and are convinced that "someone must be to blame" for
every little thing that happens to them (though that's certainly part of it!) And more.</p>

<p>By demonstrating that the problem is the result of a multitude of factors, and by giving
examples of real cases, TSA's purpose is to provoke thought about (and drive public
discussion of) the very real impact that the lawsuit industry has on us all. "Lawsuit
industry"? You bet: lawsuits drained 2.33 percent out of America's Gross Domestic Product in
2001. That's many billions more than the nation's 2001 budget for Medicare, yet lawyers still
claim there's "no lawsuit problem" in this country! By 2005, it's estimated that every man,
woman and child in the U.S. will be out of pocket $1,000 to pay for their "share" of
lawsuits. Even if you don't lose a lawsuit, you pay that "share" in the form of higher cost
for the products you buy every day. And there's no reduction in sight.</p>

<p>Public discourse of the legal system is vital to getting a grasp on the issues and solving this very real and growing problem. Yet there are groups that are actively working to stop you from getting the information you need to be informed and make up your own mind. Indeed, they want an even larger monopoly on the practice of law. <P>Would that be the American Trial Lawyer
Association, which screams that "things like the 'Stella Award' ... are part of a massive
disinformation campaign designed to undermine Americans' confidence in our legal system"?
Nope.</p>

<p>The American Bar Association seriously thinks that no one in the country should be
allowed to provide any sort of legal advice to anyone unless they're a Bar-certified
attorney.</p>

<p>The ABA's "Task Force on the Model Definition of the Practice of Law" proposes
that each state adopt a law to codify what it means to "practice law", and that "The practice
of law shall be performed only by those authorized by the highest court" of each state --
attorneys. If they succeed, those state laws would be dictated word for word by the ABA.</p>

<p>Attorneys already dominate the legal system. Most legislators are lawyers. Most judges are
lawyers. Wouldn't you like to sometimes get an outsider's perspective on what your legal
rights and responsibilities might be? If the ABA gets its way, that would be illegal. Really.</p>

<p>Your tax preparer, real estate broker, labor union representative, credit counselor,
Hollywood agent or even your family members could be hit with not just civil fines, but even
jailed for daring to give you any sort of legal advice. Help you negotiate a contract?
Forbidden! Even "selecting, drafting or completing legal documents" by non-lawyers or "giving
advice or counsel to persons as to their legal rights" would be <I>illegal</i> for anyone who
is not a lawyer, and those who dare trespass on the lawyers' newly expanded turf could be
punished with both civil and criminal penalties -- which transgression will be prosecuted, of
course, by lawyers.</p>

<p>ABA President Alfred P. Carlton Jr claims the proposal is simply a way to provide a "clear definition" of what the practice of law is "because there is not, in most jurisdictions, a well-understood or bright-line definition of what is and is not the practice of law." But boy, would the ABA like to draw that line! And they're working to make it so.</p>

<p>How far would their proposal go? "Dear Abby would be subject to prosecution every time she
answered a reader's letter that dealt with a legal issue," says Thomas M. Gordon, a lawyer in
Washington, D.C. And no, he's not kidding.</p>

<p>The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is opposed to the ABA's proposal. "We don't think it's good public policy to constrain competition in the absence of really strong evidence that the constraint has an offsetting benefit," says the FTC's deputy director of the office of policy planning, Jerry Ellig. "We haven't seen evidence of how consumers are more protected if an attorney is present."</p>

<p>That objection of course, has been scorned by the ABA. "Quite frankly, [the objection] proceeds from the FTC's desire to assert what jurisdiction it has over the legal profession," harumphed attorney Dudley Humphrey of North Carolina, who helped draft the ABA's proposal. The ABA's faulting the FTC for trying to protect its turf is merely an ironic example of the pot trying to call the kettle black, while conveniently ignoring that consumer protection is the FTC's
job!</p>

<p>ABA attorney Humphrey admits that real estate transactions are a driving force behind
the ABA's proposal. More than 80 percent of real estate closings are accomplished without the
assistance of a lawyer since only about 10 states require a lawyer to complete the paperwork
involved; quite naturally, when a lawyer is not required, a lawyer is rarely used. "Real
estate work has been the bread-and-butter work of lawyers," Humphrey says. "It's the thing
that keeps the doors open and the lights turned on. Certain elements in the real estate
community, to speak quite frankly, are increasingly pressing to drive down prices."</p>

<p>Oh dear! We can't have <I>that</i> now, can we? Not when there are a lot of hungry lawyers out there ready to bill out their time at hundreds of dollars per hour to help you fill out
standardized forms!</p>

<p>The ABA proposal would exempt the time-honored practice of <I>in pro per</i> cases (representing yourself in court), but then only an attorney would be allowed to give advice on how best to proceed! What about, then, the police "advising" you of your "Miranda" rights? That's not addressed in the proposal, but it's likely that such court-ordered forms of "advice" could still be given -- but of course only in the exact form dictated by the court.</p>

<p>Is there truly a problem with the definition of "legal practice"? No. "There isn't too much trouble in defining law practice for lawyers appearing in courtrooms and before administrative agencies," says Professor Geoffrey Hazard of the University of Pennsylvania Law School. "The difficulty is that most of what lawyers do is office practice, and what they do in office practice is often about the same thing as lots of non-lawyer officials in companies and governments do." The ABA, he says, "is going to have a lot of difficulty with a definition that is intelligent and meaningful but not overly broad." And, he adds, that would be very difficult to do. Thus, the ABA wants to make it a legal requirement in every state that you need a lawyer to fill out forms and represent you in every negotiation.</p>

<p>The ABA's proposal is "breathtakingly broad," agrees Professor Steven Lubet of Northwestern University in Chicago. "It really reflects the worst of the profession, which is to assume that lawyers own the law and legal discourse. It's anti-democratic. In a democracy, everyone has an interest in discussing the law. The content of the law, rights and remedies, is meant to be part of the public discourse."</p>

<p>In addition to the FTC and professors Hazard and Lubet -- who both teach legal ethics -- even many members of the ABA oppose their organization's proposal. Robert Joseph, chairman of the ABA's antitrust law section, says making legal advice from non-lawyers illegal is the wrong approach. He says lawyers should have to compete with non-lawyers, and show consumers why they do a better job at a competitive price. Huh: pretty much what used to be called "The American Way" before "gimmie gimmie gimmie" took over.</p>

<p>If there are too many lawyers to do the amount of actual legal work needed, the solution isn't to make more work for lawyers at the non-productive expense of the American economy. Rather, the solution is what the rest of the economy has to deal with: "downsizing", "right-sizing" or whatever your preferred euphemism is for layoffs. That lawyers will take the sort of ridiculous cases featured in TSA is already a symptom of too many lawyers. Outrageous limitations on the right to do something as simple as negotiate the terms of a contract are nothing but a pathetic attempt to grab even more power that lawyers, a class of professionals who already enjoy a gigantic monopoly, already have. As the explosion of lawsuits show, it's time to reduce that power, not increase it at the expense of the very people the law is supposed to serve and protect.</p>

<p><font size="+1"><b>Sources:</b></font>
<ul><li>"U.S. Opposes Proposal to Limit Who May Give Legal Advice", <a href=
"http://StellaAwards.com/cgi-bin/redirect3.pl?24a" target="new"><i>New York Times</i></a>, 3
February 2003
<li>"Very Expensive Suits" (Cost of lawsuits per U.S. citizen, adjusted for inflation), <a href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/articles/0,15114,424183,00.html" target=
"new"><I>Fortune</i> magazine</a>, 3 March 2003
<li>"Task Force on the Model Definition of the Practice of Law", <a href="http://StellaAwards.com/cgi-bin/redirect3.pl?24b" target="new">American Bar Association</a>, Draft Proposal of 18 September 2002</ul>

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Error</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/error.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2361" title="Error" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2361</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:21:21Z</published>
    <updated>2011-06-14T02:05:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice that ) Defendants. ) Oops: There&apos;s a Problem! _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice that
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2"><b>Oops: There's a Problem!</b></font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font></p>

<p><font size="+2"><b>Javascript Required</b></font></p>

<p>To thwart spammer scum, who try to post garbage to our site via forms (which, duh, doesn't even work), we've had to change how forms are processed here: they require that your browser has Javascript enabled. Most browsers do, but apparently yours does not, or you're using software that blocks it. Please re-enable your Javascript and try again. Sorry for the hassle, but we were getting so much spam we had to take action.</p>

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stella Awards Media Notices</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/media.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2360" title="Stella Awards Media Notices" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2360</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T22:16:04Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-27T00:51:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice that ) Defendants. ) The Media Speaks _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice that
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">The Media Speaks</font>
_____________________________)
</pre><BLOCKQUOTE>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<P><FONT SIZE="+1">May it please the court:</font>
<P>Just a few examples of what the media says about the <I>True</i> Stella Awards (most recent first):
<UL><LI>"Randy Cassingham, ...who also debunks the Stellas on his website, says he is angry about the [urban legend] tales -- not only because they are false but also because they divert attention from what he believes are real abuses in the legal system." <I>--Los Angeles Times</i></li>
<P><LI>"[In the history of hot coffee lawsuits against McDonald's,] Stella Liebeck is considered the most successful claimant at this point. The case provided the inspiration for the True Stella Awards for [the] most incredible lawsuits within the American court system." <I>--Pravda</i> (Russia)</li>
<P><LI>"If, after slogging your way through the dense thicket of a typical legal document, you are ready to sell your belongings and live under a bridge, be sure to take a break and exercise your right to laugh. One place to begin this restoration of sanity is The Stella Awards, which chronicles the sad-yet-true mess of ridiculous lawsuits." <I>--San Diego ComputorEdge</i></li>
<P><LI>"Named after Stella Liebeck, the woman who sued McDonald's after spilling hot coffee in herself, the Stella Awards are presented anually in recognition of the most absurd lawsuits in America." <I>--Reader's Digest</i></li>
<P><LI><img src="images/foxnews.jpg" align="right" alt="Stella Awards author Randy Cassingham talks about silly cases on Fox News."> "Along with the Darwin Awards, the Stella Awards are some of the most bizarre and tragically funny honours on the web." <I>--Bermuda Sun</i></li>
<P><LI>"The Stella Awards recognize the most outrageous U.S. lawsuits of the year." <I>--Toronto Globe & Mail</i> (Canada)</li>
<P><LI>"On top of producing This is True, Cassingham has his sister site, the True Stella Awards, which is just as entertaining. Cassingham's taglines are always clever and humorous, and the articles he cites are always fascinating." <I>--Saskatchewan Lifestyles</i> (Canada)</li>
<P><LI>"The Oscars for creative litigation." <I>--Guardian</i> (London)</li>
<P><LI>"Bizarre... frivolous.... Actual cases of weird lawsuits." <I>--WCLT Radio</i>
(Newark, Ohio)</li>
<P><LI>"The True Stella Awards only publishes outrageous cases that [Cassingham] can verify, giving you a source of ammunition in talking with lawmakers and business colleagues about the need for changes in the tort system." <I>--Nebraska Trucker</i> magazine</li>
<P><LI>"He has no trouble finding loony lawsuits for the site," Cassingham said. Lawyers have convinced Americans that every time something bad happens, someone has to pay -- even if that someone was not at fault." <I>--Newark Star-Ledger</i></li>
<P><LI>"Online, the name Stella has become shorthand for an outrageous or ridiculous lawsuit. One site, StellaAwards.com, honors those who spectacularly misuse the legal system." <I>--Playboy</i></li>
<P><LI>"While we're talking weird, be sure to visit This is True's sister site, The Stella Awards. It is 'awards' for 'wild, outrageous, or ridiculous lawsuits'." <I>--News24</i> (South Africa)</li>
<P><LI>"The real Stella Awards are a project of This is True, a weekly news commentary of bizarre-but-true stories and commentary by Colorado columnist Randy Cassingham." <I>--Oklahoma Gazette</i></li>
<P><LI>"There is a real Stella Awards list, compiled by Colorado humorist Randy
Cassingham. His true cases of lawsuit abuse are almost as outrageous as the made up ones." <I>--Macon Telegraph</i></li>
<P><LI>"Not specifically Christian, but still pretty useful, are the <B>Stella Awards.</b> 'Stella Awards' are stories about impossible, outrageous legal claims. Whenever there's a new (genuine) Stella story, this site will send it to you by e-mail, thus supplying you with loads of free discussion material on greed, blame, stupidity, avoiding responsibility, living in a dream world, and lots more besides. <I>--Youthwork</i> Magazine (Resources for Christian Youth Ministry; U.K.)</li>
<P><LI>"Do you remember Stella Liebeck? You might appreciate a Web site named after her...." <I>--Billings Gazette</i></li>
<P><LI>"If it's a lawsuit with a mind-boggling lack of merit or a demand for an outsize settlement, you can count on Randy to find it out and report on the details." <I>--List-a-Day.com</i></li>
<P><LI>"Journalist/Humorist <B>Randy Cassingham</b> has a knack for devising entertaining and provocative syndicated columns and e-mail publications. His newest is the Stella Awards, true stories about ridiculous U.S. legal cases." <I>--Poynter Institute E-Media Tidbits</i></li>
<P><CENTER><I>- v -</i></center>
<P><LI>This site has also been featured by the <I>Albuquerque Journal,</i> CNN,
<I>Columbus Dispatch, Spiegel</i> (Germany), Aurora (Ill.) <I>Beacon-News, Hyena</i>
(Czech Republic), <I>Le Monde</i> (France), <I>Washington Post, Fairbanks Daily
News-Miner, The Litigious Times</i> (publication of the Financial Advisor's Legal
Association), <I>Stern</i> (Germany), <I>Ventura County Star,</i> and many more (and radio stations too numerous to mention!)</li></ul>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stella Awards Frequently Asked Questions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/faq.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2357" title="Stella Awards Frequently Asked Questions" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2357</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T21:55:40Z</published>
    <updated>2011-06-14T01:25:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of ) Defendants. ) Several Frequently Asked Questions _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Several Frequently Asked Questions</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font></p>
<p>There are several questions people ask a lot. As we go along, many will be answered here. </p>
<p><hr></p>
<p><b>Q:</b> The case about such-and-such was interesting, but <i>what happened?</i> Was it dismissed? Did they win? What?</p>
<p><b>A:</b> If the case has concluded by the time it has been written up, the write-up will
have the conclusion. But in many instances, we just don't know: unlike half-hour TV shows,
things in the real world don't resolve quickly. Lawsuits typically take <i>years</i> to get
through the system -- <i>in part because there are so many cases!</i> If we learn the outcome
later, we'll update the case report and note the update in the newsletter.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<p><b>Q:</b> You reported that the case about such-and-such was dismissed. That proves the system works!</p>
<p><b>A:</b> The True Stella Awards isn't about a "broken" court system, just as it's not a
harangue against lawyers. Just because a case is thrown out doesn't mean it's not frivolous;
indeed, it's an obvious sign that it is. TSA is also not about frivolous cases succeeding; it's about the abuse of the courts, and a frivolous suit doesn't even have to make it to trial to be an utter waste of time, money, and court resources. TSA is ultimately about society, and the increasing trend toward demanding compensation from someone (anyone!) for every little slight. It's about the growing something-for-nothing attitude in America that others "owe" us huge sums of money to pay for every perceived wrong. It's about an ever-growing burden on society in the form of a hidden so-called "tax" that we all pay in higher insurance premiums, reduced access to health care, and higher product costs to pay for ever-growing judgments in often-ridiculous cases that clog up the courts for years, slowing down progress on righteous cases. And TSA is here to illustrate the various causes of the overall problem: it's not just the courts, the lawyers, the plaintiffs, the insurance companies, the judges, the juries, or an increasingly sick society: it's all of these things together -- which is why virtually all attempts at "tort reform" will fail: they only address specific parts (the parts funded by monied special interests), not the whole problem. Or, if you will, minor symptoms, rather than the systemic disease.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<p><b>Q:</b> I like the way you think. I agree the problem is complex, serious and systemic. So what should we as a society <i>do</i> about this problem?</p>
<p><b>A:</b> Indeed the problem <i>is</i> complex, serious and systemic. Thus more than a "Band-Aid" solution is required. Most proposals for reform put forth by special interests address are "Band-Aids" -- they address a specific portion of the problem, and their "solution" benefits the people funding that special interest group. To even give you an idea as to what is needed would take several book chapters. And, in fact, TSA author Randy Cassingham has dedicated several chapters in his book just to give an overview of what's needed. It can't really be  condensed to a one-paragraph FAQ answer.</p>
<p><hr></p>
<p><b>Q:</b> What special interest does TSA represent?</p>
<p><b>A:</b> None. See <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/aboutus.html">this page</a> for details.</p>

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Ellen Awards</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/ellen.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2355" title="The Ellen Awards" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2355</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T21:44:09Z</published>
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:50:54Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice that ) Defendants. ) We Recognize a New &quot;Award&quot; Category _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <FONT SIZE="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice that
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <FONT SIZE="+2">We Recognize a New "Award" Category</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> TSA author Randy Cassingham often gets
letters from readers. Sometimes the letters disagree with him. He's fine with that. But sometimes the letters are barely comprehensible rants that help to illustrate why we have a problem in our courts. In January 2005, he got one of those; it was from Ellen in, as far as
he can tell, New Jersey.</p>

<p>She wrote:</p>
<blockquote>how much money do you get from private industry such as insurers and of course you leave alot of facts out of the case typical -- you are a liar</blockquote>

<p>(As you have gathered, her spelling and punctuation have been left untouched.)</p>

<p>Randy replied that we get <i>no</i> money from insurers or anyone else, except obviously for <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/ads.html">advertisers</a>, as has long been noted on this site's "<a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/aboutus.html">About Us</a>" page -- and he asked exactly which "case" she referred to. She replied:

<blockquote>you sure are credible you are yoaur own source and then you don't even bother to keep up your lies Get the McFacts liar! I do know the facts of the McDonalds' case including the reduction of the award --which you never seem to mention and the fact that McDonald's knew before the accident the coffee was too hot you are clearly a tool and not the sha perhaps your are ignorant of the facts but I doubt it perhaps the Randys need to be awarded for the stupidest statement made in public</blockquote>

<p>Ah: she's talking about the original "Stella" case. So Randy asked her if she actually has
<i>read</i> what he had to say about that case, including the fact that Stella's multi-million-dollar award was reduced. It's been on this web site for years -- <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/stella.html">Stella's Case write-up</a>.</p>

<p>Sure enough: no reply. Such people don't care about facts; they're simply terrified at being
called to task for their idiotic lawsuits, and their own ideas of what's fair. There's no debate allowed: just semi-literate screaming at someone when they haven't even asked what their position might be. We refuse to play by their rules. The True Stella Awards is all about driving that public debate. You may not agree with the way we do it, but if we can raise your awareness of the issue, then we're doing our job.</p>

<p>So, at Ellen's suggestion, we hereby give out the first Award for Stupidest Statement Made in Public. Congratulations, Ellen! And in the tradition of such awards, it won't be named after Randy; yes, it simply must be called <I>...The Ellen Award.</i></p>

<p>(Some reader comments are included below.)</p>

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>

<h2>Reader Comments on Ellen</h2>

<p>Even though TSA concentrates solely on U.S. cases, readers from all over the world could relate to having to deal with someone like Ellen:</p>

<ul><li>In today's day and age it is shocking to still find individuals with tunnel vision. They have thought it through in their heads that they are right and everybody else is just out to get them. I have a solution: we are always in need of screamers over here in South Africa. Just send her over, and we'll put her in parliament. I'm sure she will do just fine! <B>--Marius, Accountant, Gauteng, South Africa</b>
<br /><li>Ellen's award is aptly named. Even before reading your replies I remembered all the facts you have laid out about the original Stella case. <b>--Mark, Engineer, Queensland, Australia</b>
<br /><li>Could I suggest that one of the criteria for this award be one you had highlighted in Ellen's own mangled missive? The abuse of our wonderful language by those who do not choose (or simply do not care enough) to use it correctly. While illiteracy has always been common, the advent of computerised bulletin boards and their like has allowed anyone with a computer to post his or her thoughts, regardless of their value or lack thereof, with a level of literacy that would have shamed me, or any of my contemporaries, when we were in our first year at secondary school (that's at age eleven in the UK). <b>--Richard, Trainer and Writer, Surrey, UK</b>
<br /><li>Ah... The Ellen Award! The entire manufacturing segment of the U.S. economy could be turned around by the factories running 24/7 to produce these things. Hardly a day goes by when we are not subjected to similarly incoherent, stream-of-semiconsciousness grade-school prattle. Could these people actually believe that anyone could put any stock in the rationale of what they write when they don't have even the most rudimentary command of written communication? If the level of language skills is any indication of the competence of the ideas buried in this garble, then the Ellen Award will be served up more often than the Big Mac before you can say "Punctuation? What punctuation?" <b>--Wally, Cartographer, New Jersey, USA</b></ul>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Contacting Us</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/contact.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2354" title="Contacting Us" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2354</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T21:42:08Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-26T23:42:20Z</updated>
    
    <summary> OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) stipulates the following ) Defendants. ) Contact Information _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<pre>
OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <font size="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <font size="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      stipulates the following
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <font size="+2">Contact Information</font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> StellaAwards.com is a
publication of Freelance Communications, an imprint of This<i>is</i>true.Inc, a Colorado
Corporation.</p>
<ul><li><b>To Submit Case Leads:</b> We do <i>not</i> accept case suggestions, thanks!</li>
<br /><li><b>Our Mailing Address:</b> PO Box 666, Ridgway CO 81432 USA</li>
<br /><li><b>Author's Name:</b> Randy Cassingham</li>
<br /><li><b>All comments become the property of ThisIsTrue.Inc and may be published.</b> Such publication may include your name and location, but per our e-mail privacy policy will <i>not</i> include your e-mail address.</li>

<h2>To Send a Comment or Ask a Question...</h2>
<b>Use this form:</b>
<p><!-- Begin Freedback Form -->
<form enctype="multipart/form-data" method="post" action="http://www.freedback.com/mail.php" accept-charset="UTF-8">
<div>
<input type="hidden" name="acctid" id="acctid" value="wofrwy4jmw8ixxwu" />
<input type="hidden" name="formid" id="formid" value="1113944" />
<input type="hidden" name="required_vars" id="required_vars" value="name,email,field-0698b24dc2bef5c" />
</div>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" border="0">
<tr><td valign="top"><strong>Your Name:</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><input type="text" name="name" id="name" size="40" value="" /></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top"><strong>Your Email Address:</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><input type="text" name="email" id="email" size="40" value="" /></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top"><strong>Subject</strong></td>
<td valign="top">
<select name="field-0698b24dc2bef5c" id="field-0698b24dc2bef5c">
<option value="General Comment or Question">General Comment or Question</option>
<option value="Order Problem">Order Problem</option>
<option value="Press Inquiry">Press Inquiry</option>
<option value="Other">Other</option>
</select></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top"><strong>Comments</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><textarea name="field-3e74d1c6ad6a526" id="field-3e74d1c6ad6a526" rows="6" cols="50"></textarea></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><input type="submit" value=" Submit Form " /></td></tr>
</table></form>
<!-- End Freedback Form -->

<br /><li><b>Telephone:</b>
<ul><li>For Subsidiary Rights Requests:</b> The True Stella Awards is represented by literary agent Andrew Stuart, 212-586-2711 (New York business hours)
<li><b>If you <u>must</u> contact the author,</b> <i>the above form is preferred!</i> Otherwise, you can try 970-626-6288 (10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. in <b>Colorado</b> -- Mountain Time zone. <b>Note:</b> <I>Always</i> leave your e-mail address in your message if you get our voice mail!)</ul>
<p>&reg; "Stella Awards" and "This is True" are registered trademarks of ThisIsTrue.Inc. <br />&copy; "Stella Awards" stories, title slugs, comments and author's notes are all copyrighted in the year created, and registered with the U.S. Library of Congress Register of Copyrights. All rights reserved, including all International Rights as provided by the Berne Convention.

<p>Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Stella Awards Case Log</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/caselog.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2351" title="Stella Awards Case Log" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2351</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T21:16:38Z</published>
    <updated>2011-03-22T21:42:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of ) Defendants. ) The Following Cases Already Heard _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <font size="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <font size="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <font size="+2"><b>The Following Cases Already Heard</b></font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<BLOCKQUOTE>

<P><FONT SIZE="+1">May it please the court:</font> Quite a few cases have already been
presented to the Court of Public Opinion. This page lists the cases that are included in the
<a href="book.html">True Stella Awards Book</a>, <I>now available</i> at your favorite
bookstore! The second page lists cases that were published in the TSA newsletter after the
book went off to press.

<P>The book is positively stuffed with astounding cases: <P><B>Chapter 1: Introduction --</b>
The Birth of the True Stella Awards, including the case of our namesake, <a href=
"stella.html">Stella Liebeck</a>. <P><B>Chapter 2: Abusing the Courts to Further an Agenda --
</b> A "reality" show on the Science <I>Fiction</i> cable TV network features a "Voodoo
Priestess". But a special interest group says she's not <I>really</i> a Voodoo Priestess, but
merely a priestess of "Yemoja in the Ifa tradition". Oh, the horror. It sues SciFi, demanding
the court order it to change its "advertising and content". &sect; Lawyer reads that "trans-
fats" are bad for you, so he 1) starts a non-profit informational organization, 2) sues one
snackfood company that uses trans-fats, demanding that they stop selling one product to
children in California, and 3) drops the suit very quickly, saying his non-profit's web site
has received enough publicity. &sect; Animal rights activist wants to stop city children from
going to the rodeo -- as the free guests of the rodeo itself -- so she sues. Shouldn't the
kids' <I>parents</i> decide what their own children should see? &sect; Musician sued for
copyright infringement because he tongue-in-cheekily attributed a blank section of an album
to another musician. "I certainly wasn't quoting his silence," he said. "I claim my silence
is original silence." Perhaps in the world of lawsuits, such a claim makes some sort of
logical sense. &sect; Since the "Beltway Snipers" have been caught, the search for deep
pockets to endow the bank accounts of the victims and their families has started. First up:
the manufacturer of the gun and the store where it was apparently <I>stolen</i> from. &sect;
California says dry cleaners contaminated the water supply, so they sue. Not <I>current</i>
dry cleaners, mind you, but elderly people who retired from the business 30 years ago. Oh,
and people who have bought the buildings that once, long ago, had a dry cleaning
establishment in it. &sect; Adult gets drunk at party, drives away and is killed in car
crash. Who's to blame? Not the drunk: His girlfriend, for allegedly letting him drive. His
girlfriend's mother, for buying the car for her daughter. The owner of the house the party
was in, even though he wasn't there. The girl who rented the house from him. Oh, yeah: and
Coors Brewing Co., who made the beer. &sect; Zoo officials decide to move elephant to
different zoo to put her with her own kind. But that would interfere with a "special
relationship" she has with an elephant of a different species, woman says, so she sues to
stop the transfer. <P><B>Chapter 3: Medical Cases (or, The Wrong Medicine) --</b>  Obese,
cigarette-smoking woman with high blood pressure, high cholesterol and a family history of
coronary artery disease suffers the expected heath problems associated with those risk
factors. Why? Because her doctors didn't force her to change her habits! She sues for $1
million. &sect; Women sue doctors and hospital for "Needless Infliction of Emotional
Distress" because they witnessed doctors rushing to aid their very ill mother. Had their case
succeeded (it went all the way up to the California Supreme Court!), doctors and hospitals
would have been forced to keep family members away anytime they are doing any sort of medical
procedures which, let's face it, are often ugly to watch. They put your right to be there for
<I>your</i> family members at risk. &sect; Schoolboy running for bus runs into a teacher. She
sues the 11-year-old, claiming he "negligently and carelessly" ran into her at an "excessive
rate of speed," which caused "severe and multiple injuries". &sect; Dying man eats a
McDonald's burrito but can't take the spices in it. Wife, upset that she didn't get a refund
or a free Happy Meal when she complained, decides to sue. &sect; Woman claims a bad hair
treatment at a salon was enough to cause her emotional distress, depression and to "shut
down" so much that she was caused to retire early from her university teaching job and a side
job -- and the jury buys it! &sect; 375-pound woman steps on 53-year-old grave, which
collapses under her weight. "I thought I was in a Stephen King movie," she says, which is
apparently sufficient grounds for a lawsuit. &sect; Man uses restroom stall in city building
that doesn't have a door knob. When he sticks his hand through the hole, he gets hurt -- and,
of course, sues. He <I>wins</i> almost $3 million. His occupation? City claims examiner.
&sect; Woman gets locked in a storage unit and didn't ever call out for help. She ended up
being locked in the dark for 63 days. When she sued the storage company for $10 million, the
jury wasn't allowed to hear <I>why</i> she didn't call out for help: she's mentally ill. They
found in her favor, but were still so suspicious of her story they "only" awarded her
$100,000. &sect; Man sues fast food chain over its too-hot onion rings, which reminds the
newspaper reporter of Stella. &sect; Attorney cleaning his pool decides to knock palm frond
from overhead electrical wires. When he's quite naturally electrocuted, his wife knows who's
to blame: the electric company and the company who sold him the pool skimmer, of course! <P>
<B>Chapter 4: It's Not <U>My</u> Responsibility! -- </b> Man says he is having heart attacks
and got diabetes because he's obese. Why is he obese? Because McDonald's, Burger King,
Wendy's and KFC <I>failed to tell him</i> that he shouldn't eat their fast food multiple
times per week. Meanwhile, a federal judge throws out a similar case filed by obese children,
but legal observers warn that's not the end of the issue. &sect; Drunk climbs under parked
truck and passes out. When the inevitable happens (yep: squished), who's responsible?
According to a lawsuit filed by his mother, <I>everybody</i> -- except, of course, him.
&sect; Who to sue in the Rhode Island night club fire where 100 people died? How about the
corporate owner of a local radio station that ran a few paid ads for the concert? And....
&sect; Professional big game hunter goes on safari and shoots a lion. It didn't drop dead
immediately since he was loaded for rhino and hippo, not lion, and he's mauled. Whose fault
is it that the "professional" hunter has the wrong ammo? Why, the ammo manufacturer, of
course! He sues. &sect; Drunk pedestrian steps in front of car and is run over. Police
exonerate the driver, but the drunk's family sues for $3 million. &sect; Driver, fearing she
is about to step in front of him, stops for jay-walking pedestrian. When she passes in front
of his vehicle and steps into the next lane without looking, she is hit and severely injured
by another car. Who's at fault? The driver who stopped, of course! Her parents' lawsuit is
thrown out, but an appeals court restores the case. &sect; Police officer with handcuffed
suspect in the back of her police car decides she needs to stun him with her Taser. She
"accidentally" pulls her service firearm (which "any reasonable police officer" could do), so
who is to blame? Taser! The officer and her police department thus sue the manufacturer.
&sect; Man hit by lightning in parking lot. A classic "act of God"? Heavens no! It's the
fault of the amusement park that owns the lot, man says in his lawsuit -- they "could have
told the people not to go to their cars," his lawyer says. &sect; Woman broken down in her
car in a public place decides not to wait for the tow truck to take her on a 60-mile jaunt.
Instead, she takes a ride with a stranger -- who rapes and murders her. Yeah yeah, he's
caught and convicted, but surely someone needs to <I>pay.</i> How about the auto club? <P><B>
Chapter 5: Petty Squabbles --</b> &sect; The famous "pink flamingoes" case: neighbors fight
developer by junking their yard; developer sues for $8 million because the junky yard is
hindering the sale of the $1.35 million house he built. Is the developer wrong, for suing --
especially for so much? Or is the neighbor wrong, for junking his own yard? &sect; Woman
reprimanded by her supervisor for using the office fax machine for personal business sues --
with amusing results. &sect; Woman sues after a car wreck, claiming the auto manufacturer was
at fault because it "failed to provide instructions regarding the safe and proper use of a
seatbelt." &sect; Class action lawsuit filed against Palm, since the m130 PDA is advertised
as showing "more than 65,000 colors" when it really is only capable of producing 58,621
colors. &sect; "God knows 'you don't go for the food'" reads the review of an offbeat
restaurant that strives to "entertain" guests. Ah, but this is America! A bad review? Then of
course the restaurant must sue the reviewers! &sect; Man makes gag "Wanted Poster" of someone
he knows -- who sues him for defamation. &sect; &sect; Newspaper food columnist "became
dependent" on the "spiritual self-healing treatments" of the newspaper's "spiritual advice"
columnist, paying her between $2 million and $3 million before the spiritualist gets tired of
pampering her. The poor victim sues for at least $1 million but not for the money, but rather
because "people should be accountable for the harm they cause me." &sect; Woman notes that
the receipt she gets when she pays her cell phone bill has a minor slur -- not against her,
but against the <I>town</i> she lives in: it's spelled wrong. It goes on for month after
month. Does she complain and get it changed? No: she sues. &sect; A group of female employees
at a supermarket see a customer walk through the store wearing tight "see-through" shorts --
with nothing on under. "Sexual harassment!" they cry in unison in a Human Rights Act lawsuit
...which the jury throws out on its rear. <P><B>Chapter 6: It's My Right! -- </b> Baseball
heckler so abusive that fans near him complain, so team asks him privately to quiet down a
bit, please. No way, he says -- the team is violating his freedom of speech! He sues. &sect;
Multiply- pierced woman told by her employer she can't wear her earrings, eyebrow ring, lip
ring (etc.) when she works with the public. "Discrimination!" she cries -- <I>religious</i>
discrimination, since she is a member of the "Church of Body Modification". She sues for $2
million. &sect; Lawyer sues airline because he was forced to sit next to a fat man; "He and I
[were] literally and figuratively married from the right kneecap to the shoulder for two
hours." If the lawyer isn't careful, the man might get a big divorce settlement out of
him.... &sect; 15-year-old boy joins Babe Ruth Baseball League, but doesn't get to play as
much as he thinks he should. Does he ask for a refund of his sign-up fee? No: he sues for it.
And loses. &sect; Newspaper columnist criticizes property developer as a "poverty pimp," to
use a phrase the mayor uttered. The developer sues, but the judge agrees with the columnist
and awards her damages for having to defend the frivolous lawsuit. &sect; If you peek into a
ball park from a public place and watch the game, are you violating the sport's team
"copyright" on the view? The Chicago Cubs says yes -- and sues. &sect; Teen throws herself
off the Golden Gate Bridge. Tragic -- but who's to blame? With no one logical to sue, the
girl's mother sues the bridge's board of directors, claiming they violated the teen's
"constitutional right not to be deprived of life without due process of law." &sect; Women
file suit claiming that flight attendant's nursery rhyme was meant to degrade them because
they're black. Young flight attendant hadn't even heard the racist version of the rhyme.
&sect; Bus driver warns proselytizer to stop bothering other passengers with offers of free
bibles and literature, since passing out literature is against transit authority rules. When
she refuses to stop, she is escorted off the bus -- and sues for that "humiliating"
experience. &sect; After an accident, transit authority discovers its driver is color-blind.
Federal law requires commercial drivers to correctly see color, so he is pressured to resign.
That's not the end, though: he sues, claiming "discrimination" against color-blind people --
even though he claims he is not color-blind. &sect; Movie plot involves bad guys who want to
bulldoze a jungle. The company that made the bulldozers sues, saying they were "disparaged"
that the bad guys drove their brand. In a similar suit, toy manufacturer sues to stop movie
from showing its toy used by an adult when only children are supposed to play with it. <P><B>
Chapter 7: It Ought to Be a Crime (Lawsuits by Inmates and Criminals) --</b> In a high-
publicity case, road rage man grabs victim's dog and throws it to its death in traffic. He's
jailed for felony animal cruelty, but sues his victim for saying "slanderous" things about
him to a newspaper. Oh, and may as well sue the newspaper, too.... &sect; State inmate sues
prison system claiming they're not letting him practice his religion -- he's a Druid Vampire,
and must be allowed sexual access to a "vampress". &sect; Woman commits fraud to get a no-
limit credit card and runs up a nearly million-dollar debt. When credit card company sues her
demanding she pay her bill, she counter-sues, claiming the company "knew or should have known
that [she] was acting impulsively and irrationally at the time." &sect; Cops confront burglar
hiding in a building. When he makes a sudden move, they think he's going for a gun and shoot
him. Too bad, so sad, right? He was in the middle of committing a felony! The burglar even
pleaded guilty, but sued the cops for shooting him, even though investigations found the
officers blameless. &sect; Man confronts burglar. Even though he has a shotgun, the burglar
attacks him, so the man shoots him. The district attorney declared the shooting justified.
End of case? No way! The burglar's family sues the man ...and wins. &sect; Man flees police,
drives into construction zone -- and off end of unfinished bridge. Father sues for wrongful
death, blaming everyone for his son's actions ...except, of course, for his son. <P><B>
Chapter 8: The Class Action Lottery --</b> Old state law says retailers have to mark the
price on every item for sale. Most retailers ignore the law: it would drive costs way up --
and those costs would be passed along to consumers. Man complains about one store to state
attorney general, who deems the case not worthy of pursuing -- so the man sues the store.
$3.8 million settlement goes to wide variety of groups -- including half to lawyers -- but
not one cent goes to the supposed victims. &sect; Some Americans who worked with asbestos are
coming down with terrible lung diseases. In some cases, employers even ignored safety
precautions, adding to the problem. But lawyers are trolling for potential "victims", who
trade away their right to sue for a few thousand bucks. Worse, studies show that up to 80
percent of these "victims" have no health problem whatever. Result: companies that used
asbestos are going bankrupt, leaving the 20 percent that <I>do</i> have problems with little
or nothing. But wait: that's not all.... &sect; Mississippi woman hears there's a class
action suit against the drug Propulsid. She gets in on the suit because "I might get a couple
of thousand dollars" -- even though she admits "I didn't get hurt by Propulsid." Getting sued
by yet another patient who had no injuries was the last straw for her doctor, who decided to
move to another state, taking his physician wife too. That left only two doctors to serve a
two-county region. The woman wasn't harmed, but how about her neighbors, who now have
significantly reduced access to medical care? <P><B>Chapter 9: School Daze (What Our Kids are
Really Learning) -- </b> High school student works for his mother -- at her law office -- for
"work experience" credit. She assigns her son's grade, A+, but the school doesn't recognize
A+ grades, so it records an A. He sues. &sect; High school senior is exempt from physical
education and gets a higher GPA than is possible for others to get. When the school suggests
she <I>share</i> valedictorian honors, she sues to get solo credit -- and <I>wins.</i> What
happens to the civil case (where she demanded $2.7 million) is a lesson in unintended
consequences. &sect; High school student prohibited from playing baseball after he's
implicated in a major internet fraud case. Can't play baseball? That means pro baseball
scouts can't see him play! Why, <I>that</i> means he can't go pro! He sues the school for $50
million for lost earnings. &sect; High-achieving high school student is accepted at the
college of his choice, though they warn "your enrollment will depend upon your successful
completion of your current academic year." He didn't listen: he slacked off, his grades
suffered, and his acceptance is revoked. He sues to <I>force</i> the university to accept him
anyway. &sect; Cheerleaders want the world to know they're athletes, and cheerleading is a
sport. What happens when they get hurt when cheering? Why, they sue, of course! <P><B>Chapter
10: Just Plain Stupid --</b> Man works hard -- <I>very</i> hard -- to woo his fourth wife.
When his effort fails, he sues her to get back the expensive gifts he gave her. &sect; Yahoos
rent car, drive it around shooting fireworks out the window. When a rocket explodes inside,
<I>someone</i> has to be responsible for the resulting death and mayhem. But who? That's
right: they sue the car rental agency. &sect; Cable TV channel airs documentary about how
music programs help rehabilitate prisoners. One of the prisoner-musicians featured is a
murderer; his family sues for the "distress" of having to see the murderer on TV. &sect;
Woman sues county after she falls down during a goose "attack". The suit calls the goose a
"wild" and "dangerous" animal that the county should not have allowed to live in the park.
&sect; Radio station pulls practical joke on restaurant, telling the manager that he can't
pay for his meal and offers to do dishes. Manager, nervous since they were recently robbed,
calls the police. Ha ha: big joke, you're on the air! Manager -- and cop -- sue the radio
station. &sect; Man goes berzerk after his dog gets lost, spending over $20,000 on pet
"psychics" and other "professionals" to find the stray he had found on the street. Meanwhile,
he let his business collapse so he could spend full time on the search. And who's at fault
for all of this? His pet-sitter. He sues her for $160,000. &sect; Singer James Brown's
daughters sue him, claiming they are entitled to royalties for "helping" him write his songs
-- when they were as young as 3 years old. &sect; Man wins lottery, but argues that he should
have won <I>more</i> than he did. The reason? He says the vendor who sold him the tickets
didn't explain the rules to him carefully enough, that there was a cap in the amount of
winnings, and he had more winning tickets than could be cashed in. The vendor noted that he
<I>did</i> give the man the printed rules provided by the state lottery, but the court rules
against him anyway! <P><B>Chapter 11: SLAPPs and Other Corporate Abuse --</b> Sharper Image
received a bad review from <I>Consumer Reports</i> magazine for its "Ionic Breeze" air
filter. Rather than improve the product, it sued the magazine. The judge ruled it was a
"Strategic Suit Against Public Participation" -- an illegal "SLAPP" lawsuit, and sanctioned
Sharper Image. &sect; Huge toy company sues huge record company -- a singer dared to sing a
<I>parody</i> about the Barbie doll. Since "Barbie" is a registered trademark, Mattel
considers the word their property, and they can stop anyone else from uttering it or
disparaging it. In America? Wrong! &sect; Couple pays off the line of credit on their home,
but later fraudsters changed their address with the mortgage company and ran up a $142,000
balance against their home. Homecomings Financial, which didn't even bother to confirm the
address change, knows who is to blame. The people who defrauded them? No! The couple, since
(it argued) they didn't notify them of the fraud sooner. How could they, when they weren't
aware of it? &sect; The massive publicity hype over the new <I>Harry Potter</i> book is
"ruined" when a newspaper legally obtains a copy of the book and runs a review of it three
days before its highly coordinated worldwide release. Sure that added to the publicity
frenzy, but publisher Scholastic sues the newspaper for $100 million, plus "all gains,
profits, and advantages" the newspaper derived from its "unlawful" actions. &sect; America --
and the world -- was shocked by how widespread the cases of priests sexually abusing children
were. In this instance, the priest was upset that one of his victims came forward and told a
newspaper the story of being repeatedly raped -- so he sued his victim for not keeping his
mouth shut. &sect; Newspaper accidentally deposits $301,000 into paper carrier's bank account
by accident, but when he withholds $26,000 until they give him an accounting of what his pay
should be, they sue him instead. &sect; TV Show <i>60 Minutes</i> does segment on how a
certain area of Mississippi has gone lawsuit crazy (e.g., Stella Awards #1). Two jurors who
were never named in the broadcast take exception to the criticism and sue the show -- for $6
<I>billion.</i> &sect; California's voter-approved 25-cent-per-pack goes to pay for anti-
smoking campaigns. But that means that the tobacco companies are now "vilified" by
Californians, two tobacco companies say -- so they sue the state, asking a court to order a
stop to the ads. &sect; Abusive collection agency goes after check bouncer for outrageous
fees, but the victim is a paralegal and doesn't take it lying down -- she fights back and
wins significant damages. <P><B>Chapter 12: Your Turn: "Try" a Few Cases --</b> A pro
football star, while speeding in a snow storm, crashed his oversize SUV, killing his
assistant. The footballer died two weeks later from a blood clot. His mother sued, arguing
that the SUV's roof didn't meet crush standards. The defense noted that the SUV roof not only
met but exceeded the federal standards, even though it was not even required to meet them.
The mother's attorney begged the jury to send a message and award "at least $75 million,
perhaps more than $100 million," in damages. How would you rule? &sect; Man who legally
changed his name to "Jack Ass" complains MTV's "Jackass" TV series and movie demeaned,
denigrated and damaged his <I>...uh...</i> good name. No lawyer will take the case, so he
files suit by himself, demanding $50 million in damages. &sect; What's your verdict? &sect;
Woman on gambling jaunt thrown out of casino for violating house rules. After she sues for
$100,000 "civil rights violations", a mediator suggests a $17,000 settlement. But both sides
reject it, and the case heads to <I>federal</i> court. Who should win? &sect; 94-year-old
woman wins lottery jackpot -- payable over 20 years. She sues to get the full amount
immediately since "you know I'm not going to live 20 years." Should she get it? <P><B>Chapter
13: We Appeal! --</b> TSA's attorney-readers respond to some of the cases -- and to TSA
itself. Is there really no such thing as an ethical attorney? And the American Trial Lawyers
Association positively shakes in its briefs over TSA. And worse: how the American Bar
Association would like to "reform" the legal system. <P><B>Chapter 14: Conclusion --</b> What
<I>you</i> can do to really make a difference in how this all turns out. You have a lot more
power than you might think. <P><HR WIDTH=50%> <P>As you can see, the book is <i>packed</i>
with hilarious -- and maddening -- cases. You can <a href="book.html">order it right now</a>.
<P>And we continue to publish them, too. Since the book was sent off to press, we have
continued to highlight bizarre-but-true civil cases filed in U.S. courts. To see what's been
published so far, head on to <a href="caselog2.html">Page Two</a>. <P><FONT SIZE="+1">Get the
cases</font> for <I>free</i> as they're issued! If you don't already have a subscription, you
can get one right here:

<P>Submitted by: <BR>StellaAwards.com, <I>In Pro Per</i></blockquote>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The True Stella Awards Book</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/book.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2350" title="The True Stella Awards Book" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2350</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T21:04:55Z</published>
    <updated>2012-07-27T01:50:13Z</updated>
    
    <summary>OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of ) Defendants. ) All is Explained Here _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <font size="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <font size="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <font size="+2"><b>All is Explained Here</b></font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<center><font size="+1"><B>"Astonishing" ... "Hilarious" ... "Funny" ...</b></font></center>

<p><FONT SIZE="+1">May it please the court:</font> In one of his earliest newsletters, <i>True Stella Awards</i> author Randy Cassingham said, "There is no easy solution. This isn't something that 10 issues of an Internet publication will solve -- or 100 issues. Rather, it will take a lengthy and in-depth dialogue among informed citizens and reform-minded insiders to carefully weigh the pros and cons of various approaches, and then slowly and carefully introduce reforms."</p>

<center><a href="https://secure.thisistrue.com/stella.html" target="new"><img src="images/buythebook.png"></a></center>

<p>He continued: "What's 'easy' is to laugh at a Winnebago driver putting the cruise control on so he can go into the back to make a cup of coffee, and suing over the resulting crash and winning a million dollars from a sympathetic jury from a big evil corporation. So easy, in fact, that it's a lie -- it never happened. But people love sending that story around. The recipients get a laugh, say 'ain't it awful?' -- and move on to the next joke. Not so with reading TSA cases: TSA gets deeper in, explores the issue in (yes!) interesting ways and from all sorts of different angles..., and explicitly points out that the solutions aren't obvious. Such an approach stimulates thought and discussion on an important topic that affects all of us."</p>

<TABLE ALIGN="right" BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=8 WIDTH=300><TR><TD><a href="https://secure.thisistrue.com/stella.html" target="new" title="Click book to order autographed copy from author"><img src="images/stella-book.jpg" border=0></a></td></tr>
<TR><TD><P><CENTER><B>Select Reviews:</b></center>
<UL><LI><B>Astonishing:</b> "Cassingham has selected an astonishing array of cases." <I>--Publishers Weekly</i> <LI><B>Funny:</b> "The facts of the cases are funny enough all by themselves." <I>--Booklist</i> (American Library Assn)
<LI><B>Read it:</b> "How frivolous can lawsuits get? Just when you think you've heard it all, along comes a book that proves you haven't. Buy a couple of copies to give away as holiday gifts." <I>--Business KnowHow</i>
<LI><B>Hilarious:</b> "Randy Cassingham details sad and hilarious lawsuits." <I>--East Bay Express</i>
<LI><B>A Gem:</b> "After reading this book, it's not hard to imagine somebody suing Blockbuster for emotional damages incurred after the video store rented them <i>The Notebook.</i> It could happen." <I>--South Florida City Link Magazine</i></ul></td></tr></table>

<p>The <i>True Stella Awards</i> newsletter was a great place to get a talking point to discuss the issue of frivolous lawsuits, but it was difficult for a short form publication to get in-depth, to look at this complex problem in a comprehensive way from several angles. That's where <B>The True Stella Awards</b> book comes in. It retells scores of cases, many of them updated with new information, and pulls it all together in one place with analysis of <I>what to do next.</i>
<P><B>What The Book Covers</b>
<P>The book addresses:
<ul><li>Just who is Stella, and what really happened with that cup of McDonald's coffee?
<li>Using lawsuits to further a political or personal agenda.
<li>Medical cases.
<li>Blaming someone else -- <i>anyone</i> else -- for what happens to you.
<li>What happens when bullies and cry-babies grow up (they take their fights into court!)
<li>The ever-expanding concept of the "right" to sue.
<li>Suits by inmates and criminals -- sometimes they sue their victims.
<li>The class action lottery.
<li>Lawsuits against schools.
<li>Just plain <i>stupid</i> cases.
<li>How corporations use lawsuits to fight competition and anyone who criticize them.
<li>Responses from lawyer-readers -- some of them just don't get it.
<li>And pulling it all together: How can we fix the problem?</ul>

<P>The result is a big book that takes a big publisher to pull it off. So Dutton (an imprint of Penguin USA) published <I>The True Stella Awards: Honoring real cases of Greedy Opportunists, Frivolous Lawsuits, and the Law Run Amok</i> by Randy Cassingham. Randy was allotted 288 pages, but he couldn't stop without telling the <i>whole</i> story: the final book is 352 pages.</p>

<center><a href="https://secure.thisistrue.com/stella.html" target="new"><img src="images/buythebook.png"></a></center>

<P><B>Be Part of the Solution</b>
<P><p><table align="right" border=0 cellpadding=8 width="275"><tr><td bgcolor="yellow"><center><font size="+2" color="Red"><B>How To Order</b></font>
<p>Amazon no longer carries the physical books, but you can buy them <i>used</i> in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0525949135/bwbrandy-20" target="new">hardcover</a> or <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0452287715/bwbrandy-20" target="new">paperback</a>. It is available on Kindle, but for a ludicrous $11.99, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B002HUU006/bwbrandy-20" target="new">here</a>.</p>

<p>It is also available on B&N's Nook for $11.99 <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/true-stella-awards-randy-cassingham/1100316436?ean=9781101117743" target="new" rel="nofollow">here</a>. It's also $11.99 on Google Play for your Android tablet.</p>

<p>You can also order the first-edition hardcover from us <br />-- at the cover price, plus shipping -- <br />if you'd like it autographed by the author. <br>More info <a href="https://secure.thisistrue.com/stella.html" target="new">here</a> (opens in new window). <p>Hardcover, 352 pages. $18.95 cover price <br><a href="images/fulljacket.jpg">Click to see full hardcover dustjacket</a></td></tr></table>

Randy is constantly asked what ordinary people can <i>do</i> about frivolous lawsuits. His answer is in this book: it gives you everything you need to understand and intelligently discuss this urgent problem, and outlines common-sense reforms that need to be put into place. And best of all, the book is <i>entertaining</i> in a way that only Randy Cassingham can make it. You'll laugh so hard tears will stream down your face -- and you'll be so angry you'll cry out, demanding things change. (And <i>that,</i> Randy says, is what's most needed: a critical mass of citizens who understand the problem well enough to <i>demand</i> change. This is <i>your</i> chance to be a part of the solution!)

<P>And you can <b>order the book right now.</b> It's available for order for your Amazon Kindle here, or you can get a first edition hardcover autographed by the author from <a href="https://secure.thisistrue.com/stella.html" target="new">his order site</a>.

<p>Submitted by:
<br>StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Decidedly NOT the Stellas</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/bogus.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=2349" title="Decidedly NOT the Stellas" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2011://10.2349</id>
    
    <published>2011-03-19T20:24:36Z</published>
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:49:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of ) Defendants. ) Stories Not from StellaAwards.com _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <font size="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <font size="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <font size="+2"><b>Stories Not from StellaAwards.com</b></font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">May it please the court:</font> Many stories are going around the 'net saying they are "The Stella Awards". Many of these stories are false, made-up, or (sometimes) true stories with false elements added to them. It makes no sense to use false examples of real problems when there are so many true examples that illustrate the actual problem.</p>

<p>The sad part: despite these stories having been debunked <I>years</i> ago, they not only still circulate, but <I>many</i> reporters, columnists and radio "personalities" still talk about them as if they were true, which says a lot about their professionalism. In many outrageous cases, these lazy "news" people will even link to this site as the source of these silly lies! What a ridiculous lack of standards they have!</p>

<p>The most-common e-mail example is the following, which the clerk has marked "Exhibit A". We've received many, <I>many</i> copies of it over the last few years, and no doubt you have too. You'll see what we mean by "bogus".</p>

<table border=1 cellpadding=8 clear="all"><tr><td bgcolor="F5F5F5"><center><b>Claimed Case</b></center></td><td bgcolor="F5F5F5"><center><b>Status</b></center></td></tr><tr><td>Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas, was awarded $780,000 by a jury after breaking her ankle tripping over a toddler who was running amuck inside a furniture store. The owners of the store were understandably surprised at the verdict, considering the misbehaving tyke was Ms. Robertson's son.</td>
<td>Fabricated</td></tr>
<tr><td>Carl Truman, 19, of Los Angeles won $74,000 and medical expenses when his neighbor ran his hand over with a Honda Accord. Mr. Truman apparently didn't notice someone was at the wheel of the car whose hubcap he was trying to steal</td>
<td>Fabricated.</td></tr>
<tr><td>Terrence Dickson of Bristol, Penn., was exiting a house he finished robbing by way of the garage. He was not able to get the garage door to go up because the automatic door opener was malfunctioning. He couldn't re-enter the house because the door connecting the house and garage locked when he pulled it shut. The family was on vacation, so Mr. Dickson found himself locked in the garage for eight days. He subsisted on a case of Pepsi he found, and a large bag of dry dog food. Dickson sued the homeowner's insurance claiming the situation caused him undue mental anguish. The jury agreed to the tune of half a million dollars and change.</td>
<td>Fabricated.</td></tr>
<tr><td>Jerry Williams of Little Rock, Arkansas, was awarded $14,500 and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next door neighbor's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced-in yard, as was Mr. Williams. The award was less than sought after because the jury felt the dog may have been provoked by Mr. Williams who, at the time, was shooting it repeatedly with a pellet gun.</td><TD>Fabricated.</td></tr><TR><TD>A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson of Lancaster, Pennsylvania $113,500 after she slipped on a spilled soft drink and broke her coccyx. The beverage was on the floor because Ms. Carson threw it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.</td>
<td>Fabricated.</td></tr>
<tr><td>Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware, successfully sued the owner of a nightclub in a neighboring city when she fell from the bathroom window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth. This occurred while Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the window in the ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded $12,000 and dental expenses.</td>
<td>Fabricated.</td></tr>
<tr><td><b>The "winner" every year:</b> In November, Mr. Grazinski purchased a brand new 32 foot Winnebago motor home. On his first trip home, having joined the freeway, he set the cruise control at 70 mph and calmly left the drivers seat to go into the back and make himself a cup of coffee. Not surprisingly, the Winnie left the freeway, crashed and overturned. Mr. Grazinski sued Winnebago for not advising him in the handbook that he could not actually do this. He was awarded $1,750,000 plus a new Winnebago.</td>
<td>Fabricated.</td></tr>
<tr><td>And just so you know that cooler heads do occasionally prevail: Kenmore Inc., the makers of Dorothy Johnson's microwave, were found not liable for the death of Mrs. Johnson's poodle after she gave it a bath and attempted to dry it by putting the poor creature in her microwave for, "just a few minutes, on low," The case was quickly dismissed.</td>
<td>Fabricated from a <I>very</i> old urban legend!</td></tr></table>

<p>We believe the fabricated stories originated in 1994, as most versions mention <a href="http://www.StellaAwards.com/stella.html">Stella</a> is "81 years old". She was 81 in 1994, and 91 when she died in 2004.</p>

<p>StellaAwards.com has found no evidence to support these stories, nor has the leading urban legend debunker, <a href="http://www.snopes.com/legal/lawsuits.htm" target="new" rel="nofollow">Snopes.com</a>. The bottom line: after all these years, it's completely ridiculous for <i>individuals</i> to be fooled by these cases, yet every year even "legitimate" <I>newspapers</i> run these very cases crying "Ain't it awful?", and sometimes they even attribute these old dumb jokes to us, which shows just how poorly they do when it comes to fact-checking.</p>

<p>We've said it before, and we'll say it again: Truth <I>is</i> stranger than fiction. It makes no sense to use made-up stories to illustrate a real problem when there are <I>real</i> cases of lawsuit abuse going on all the time. And that's what we specialize in. Subscribe below for <B>free</b> to get <i>true</i> case reports as we release them!</p>

Submitted by:
<br />StellaAwards.com, <i>In Pro Per</i>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>True Stella Awards: the 2007 Winners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.stellaawards.com/2007.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mtb.thisistrue.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=10/entry_id=1997" title="True Stella Awards: the 2007 Winners" />
    <id>tag:test.thisistrue.com,2008://10.1997</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-01T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-06-29T19:49:18Z</updated>
    
    <summary>OPPORTUNISTS AND ) SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS ) ) StellaAwards.com Plaintiffs, ) ) pleading before the vs. ) ) Court Of Public Opinion ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS ) AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM ) begs the court to take notice of ) Defendants. ) The 2007 Stella Award Winners _____________________________)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Randy</name>
        <uri>http://www.thisistrue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stellaawards.com/">
        <![CDATA[<PRE>OPPORTUNISTS AND             )
SELF-DESCRIBED VICTIMS       )
                             )      <font size="+2">StellaAwards.com</font>
    Plaintiffs,              )
                             )      pleading before the
           vs.               )
                             )      <font size="+2">Court Of Public Opinion</font>
ANY AVAILABLE DEEP POCKETS   )
AND THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM  )      begs the court to take notice of
                             )
    Defendants.              )      <font size="+2"><b>The 2007 Stella Award Winners</b></font>
_____________________________)
</pre>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><font size="+1"><b>May it Please the Court:</b></font></p>
<p>Unlike the <a href="bogus.html">fake cases</a> that have been highly circulated online for the last several years, the following cases have been researched from public sources and are confirmed <I>true</i> by the <I>only</i> legitimate source for the Stella Awards: StellaAwards.com.</p>
<p>Annual awards also on this site: the <a href="2002.html">2002 Stella Awards</a>, the <a href="2003.html">2003 Stella Awards</a>, the <a href="2004.html">2004 Stella Awards</a>, the <a href="2005.html">2005 Stella Awards</a>, and the <a href="2006.html">2006 Stella Awards</a>.</p>

<p><hr></p>

<h1 style="clear: left">The 2007 True Stella Awards Winners</h1>
by Randy Cassingham
<br><b>Issued 1 February 2008</b>

<p><b>#3:</b></font> Sentry Insurance Company. The company provided worker's compensation insurance for a Wisconsin "Meals on Wheels" program. Delivering a meal, a MoW volunteer (who was allegedly not even wearing boots) slipped and fell on a participant's driveway that had been cleared of snow, and Sentry had to pay to care for her resulting injuries. Sentry wanted its money back, so it sued the 81-year-old homeowner getting the Meals on Wheels service. It could have simply filed for "subrogation" from her homeowner's insurance company, but by naming her in the action, it dragged an old lady into court, reinforcing the image of insurance companies as concerned only about the bottom line, not "protecting" policyholders from loss.</p>

<p><b>#2:</b> The family of Robert Hornbeck. Hornbeck volunteered for the Army and served a stint in Iraq. After getting home, he got drunk, wandered into a hotel's service area (passing "DANGER" warning signs), crawled into an air conditioning unit, and was severely cut when the machinery activated. Unable to care for himself due to his drunkenness, he bled to death. A tragedy, to be sure, but one solely caused by a supposedly responsible adult with military training. Despite his irresponsible behavior -- and his perhaps criminal trespassing -- Hornbeck's family sued the hotel for $10 million, as if it's reasonably foreseeable that some drunk fool would ignore warning signs and climb into its heavy duty machinery to sleep off his bender.</p>

<p><i>But those pale compared to...</i></p>

<p><b>The winner of the 2007 True Stella Award:</b> Roy L. Pearson Jr. The 57-year-old Administrative Law Judge from Washington DC claims that a dry cleaner lost a pair of his pants, so he sued the mom-and-pop business for $65,462,500. That's right: more than $65 million for one pair of pants. Representing himself, Judge Pearson cried in court over the loss of his pants, whining that there certainly isn't a more compelling case in the District archives. But the Superior Court judge wasn't moved: he called the case "vexatious litigation", scolded Judge Pearson for his "bad faith", and awarded damages to the dry cleaners. But Pearson didn't take no for an answer: he's appealing the decision. And he has plenty of time on his hands, since he was dismissed from his job. Last we heard, Pearson's appeal is still pending.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

